Gastric cancer: diagnosis and treatment options

Author: John C. Layke, Peter P. Lopez
Date: March 1, 2004

The overall incidence of gastric cancer in the United States has rapidly declined over the past 50 years. Gastric cancer is now the 13th most common cause of cancer mortality in the United States, with an estimated 12,100 deaths in 2003. (1) However, in developing countries, the incidence of gastric cancer is much higher and is second only to lung cancer in rates of mortality.

The typical patient with gastric cancer is male (male-to-female ratio, 1.7:1) and between 40 and 70 years of age (mean age, 65 years). Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, and blacks are twice as likely as whites to have gastric carcinoma.

Ninety-five percent of all malignant gastric tumors are adenocarcinomas; the remaining 5 percent include lymphomas, stromal tumors, and other rare tumors. (2) The overall declining incidence of gastric carcinoma is related to distal stomach tumors caused by Helicobacter pylori infection. Proximal stomach tumors of the cardiac region have actually increased in incidence in recent years. (3) This trend has been attributed to the increased incidence of Barrett's esophagus and its direct correlation with the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. (4) This review discusses diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Etiology

Many risk factors have been associated with the development of gastric cancer, and the pathogenesis is most likely multifactorial (Table 1). (2,5,6) Although significant, genetic abnormalities (such as DNA aneuploidy, oncogene amplification or mutation, and allelic loss of tumor suppressor genes) are not understood well enough to allow formulation of a sequence of progression to the development of gastric carcinoma. One postulation on the development of this disease involves a succession of histologic changes that commence with atrophic gastritis, advance to mucosal metaplasia, and eventually result in a malignancy. (2)

Certain genetic or familial syndromes, gastric colonization by H. pylori, and conditions resulting in gastric dysplasia have been reported as definite risk factors for the development of stomach cancer. The use of tobacco, dietary risk factors (i.e., high intake of salted, smoked, or pickled foods, and low intake of fruits and vegetables), and excess alcohol consumption also have been implicated as causal elements. (2,5-7) A high intake of vitamin C may have a protective effect. (8) [Evidence level B, case-control study]

Diagnosis

The initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma often is delayed because up to 80 percent of patients are asymptomatic during the early stages of stomach cancer. (9) In Japan, a higher incidence of adenocarcinoma and rigorous screening processes have led to a greater number of cases of gastric cancer being detected in an early stage (i.e., when limited to the mucosa and submucosa, with or without lymph node involvement). Unfortunately, in the United States, most cases of gastric cancer are discovered only after local invasion has advanced.

Weight loss, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, early satiety, and peptic ulcer symptoms may accompany late-stage gastric cancer. Signs may include a palpably enlarged stomach, a primary mass (rare), an enlarged liver, Virchow's node (i.e., left supraclavicular), Sister Mary Joseph's nodule (periumbilical), or Blumer's shelf (metastatic tumor felt on rectal examination, with growth in the rectouterine/ rectovesical space).

Patients presenting with the aforementioned symptoms and those with multiple risk factors for gastric carcinoma require further work-up. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the diagnostic imaging procedure of choice in the work-up of gastric carcinoma. (10) However, a double-contrast barium swallow, a cost-conscious, noninvasive, and readily available study, may be the initial step (11) (Figure 1). This radiographic study provides preliminary information that may help the physician determine if a gastric lesion is present and whether the lesion has benign or malignant features. Gastric ulcers without any malignant characteristics seen on barium swallow have a specificity of more than 95 percent in ruling out gastric cancer. However, when indeterminate results are reported or when both benign and malignant signs are present, further diagnostic evaluation is necessary.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

EGD is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test, especially when combined with endoscopic biopsy. Multiple biopsy specimens should be obtained from any visually suspicious areas; this step involves repeated sampling at the same tissue site, so that each subsequent biopsy reaches deeper into the gastric wall.

After the initial diagnosis of gastric cancer is established, further evaluation for metastases is necessary to determine treatment options. Computed tomographic (CT) scanning is a useful method of detecting liver metastases greater than 5 mm in diameter, perigastric involvement, peritoneal seeding, and involvement of other peritoneal structures (e.g., ovaries, rectal shelf). However, CT scanning is unable to allow assessment of tumor spread to adjacent lymph nodes unless they are enlarged. In addition, it has not been shown to be effective in allowing determination of the depth of tumor invasion and cannot reliably support detection of solitary liver or lung metastases smaller than 5 mm in diameter. (12)

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a modality that allows for more accurate staging. In EUS, the transducer is placed directly next to the gastric wall, and high-frequency soundwaves are used to determine the depth of tumor invasion and detect local lymph node involvement, which may be assessed by operative biopsy.

Random biopsies beyond lesion areas also are important in achieving a correct tissue diagnosis. The updated Sydney system (13) recommends that at least five biopsy specimens be taken (two from the antrum within 2 to 3 cm of the pylorus, two from the corpus about 8 cm from the cardia, and one from the incisura angularis).

Because tumor depth and lymph node involvement influence survival, EUS is an important tool for increasing preoperative staging accuracy. However, EUS cannot permit assessment of tissue beyond a depth of about 5 cm and, therefore, cannot be used to assess distant lymph node involvement or to screen for lung or liver metastases. Recent literature (14) supports the combination of CT scanning and EUS for preoperative staging of gastric cancer to best determine the number and location of involved lymph nodes.

Tumor Staging

As with all types of cancer, the most important indicator of resectability and prognosis for gastric cancer is the clinicopathologic stage. There are several similar staging classifications, but in the United States, the most commonly used system is the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging system (Table 2). (15) The two most important factors influencing survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer are the depth of cancer invasion through the gastric wall and the number of lymph nodes involved. (16,17) Unfortunately, these factors may not always be accurately assessed by the preoperative staging work-up before resection.

Primary Prevention

In the United States, approximately two thirds of patients with gastric carcinomas present in advanced stages (III or IV). (9) Because it is not possible to detect early stomach cancer on physical examination, diagnostic imaging is the only effective method for screening. Patients with risk factors for gastric cancer and problems with epigastric pain, unintentional weight loss, or other suspicious symptoms should undergo further diagnostic work-up. Endoscopy with biopsy mapping of the gastric mucosa should be considered to look for multifocal gastric metaplasia in patients who are asymptomatic but at high risk of developing gastric carcinoma because of a positive family history, racial or ethnic origin, or emigration from an area endemic for gastric cancer (e.g., Hawaii, Japan).

If multifocal atrophic gastritis is found, repeat surveillance every one to three years should be considered. If a dysplastic lesion is located on endoscopy, resection of the lesion is recommended, and annual or biannual endoscopic surveillance is reasonable. Because patients who have undergone subtotal gastrectomy have an increased risk of gastric cancer after 15 to 20 years, any upper gastrointestinal symptoms 15 years after such surgery justify an EGD with multiple biopsies. Even in asymptomatic postgastrectomy patients, endoscopy should be considered at 20 years, along with multiple biopsies, particularly at the anastomotic site. (18)

(24.) Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998;228:449-61.

(25.) Kaibara N, Sumi K, Yonekawa M, Ohta M, Makino M, Kimura O, et al. Does extensive dissection of lymph nodes improve the results of surgical treatment of gastric cancer? Am J Surg 1990;159:218-21.

(26.) Robertson CS, Chung SC, Woods SD, Griffin SM, Raimes SA, Lau JT, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy with R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:176-82.

(27.) Iriyama K, Asakawa T, Koike H, Nishiwaki H, Suzuki H. Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach? Arch Surg 1989;124:309-11.

(28.) Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. Dutch Gastric Cancer Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:908-14.

(29.) Macdonald J, Smalley S, Benedetti J, Estes N, Haller D, Ajani J, et al. Postoperative combined radiation and chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach and G.E. junction. Results of Intergroup Study INT-0116 (SWOG 9008). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:1a.

(30.) Wilke H, Preusser P, Fink U, Gunzer U, Meyer HJ, Meyer J, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: a phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1318-26.

(31.) Abe M, Takahashi M. Intraoperative radiotherapy: the Japanese experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981;7:863-8.

(32.) Myint AS. The role of radiotherapy in the palliative treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;12:381-90.

(33.) Moertel CG, Childs DS, O'Fallon JR, Holbrook MA, Schutt AJ, Reitemeier RJ. Combined 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy as a surgical adjuvant for poor prognosis gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1984;2:1249-54.

(34.) Schwarz RE. Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for patients with resected gastric cancer: intergroup 116. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1879-80.

JOHN C. LAYKE, D.O., is a resident in general surgery at the University of Illinois Metropolitan Group Hospitals residency program in Chicago. He received his medical degree from Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

PETER P. LOPEZ, M.D., is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Surgery at the University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami. He also is an attending physician in trauma and critical care at the Ryder Trauma Center at the University of Miami Jackson Memorial Medical Center. He received his medical degree from the University of Illinois School of Medicine, Chicago. Dr. Lopez completed a family practice residency at Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, and a general surgical residency at Wayne State University, Detroit. He also completed subspecialty training in trauma and surgical critical care at the University of Miami.

Address correspondence to John C. Layke, D.O., Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 836 W. Wellington Ave., Chicago, IL 60657 (e-mail: jlayke@yahoo.com). Reprints are not available from the authors.

COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Family PhysiciansCOPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group

 
© 2006, DrPlace.com, All Rights Reserved.